No. 21-6276
Terrell B. Sullivan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-split eighth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review kisor-v-wilkie united-states-v-havis united-states-v-winstead
Latest Conference:
2021-12-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Eighth Circuit Erred in Holding that Petitioner's Issue on "Certificate of Appealability" Was Not Debatable Among Jurists of Reason, When in Fact Counsel Was Ineffective for Failing to Raise the Same Textual Issues that Had Been Raised and Won in KISOR v. WILKIE, 139 S.Ct. 2400 (June 26, 2019) Before Petitioner Was Sentenced; Including UNITED STATES v. WINSTEAD, 890 F.3d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 2019) and UNITED STATES v. HAVIS, 927 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 2019)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Circuit Erred in Holding that Petitioner's Issue on 'Certificate of Appealability' Was Not Debatable Among Jurists of Reason
Docket Entries
2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Terrell B. Sullivan
Terrell B. Sullivan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent