Richard Barnhart, Jr. v. Neil Turner, Warden
Is a Petitioner denied his due process rights when the Ohio Appellate Court applies an unreasonable application of U.S. Supreme Court precedent in regards to petitioner's Constitutional right to be free of illegal search and seizure?
Is a Petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights when appellate counsel fails to argue the sufficiency of evidence error but instead argues that the conviction was against the weight of evidence?
Is a Petitioner's due process rights as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution violated when the trial court fails to grant his motion for a new trial?
Does trial counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel when he knowingly submits a vital, yet factually incorrect affidavit in support of a motion for a new trial?
Is a Petitioner denied his due process rights when the Ohio Appellate Court applies an unreasonable application of U.S. Supreme Court precedent in regards to petitioner's Constitutional right to be free of illegal search and seizure?