WAS DEFENDANT GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL?
WAS DEFENDANT FOUND CGUILTY BEYOND A RESONABLE DOUBT?
WAS PERJURED TESTMONY GIVEN TO COVER UP THE TRUTH?
WERE FAR MORE SERIOUS THANHIS IN PETITIONERS FACTS REF PEOPLE U. RVERA, 2O IL AP(2d0910G0 2011962 N.E.25.356 /1.DEC.709 PE0PL VHERMAN,07 1.APP.3 688 (201) 945 N.E. 2 54,348 11.DEC.747, PE0PLEV. SMiTH 185 I11.2d 532 (199) 708 N.E. Zd 365, 236 11.DEC.779 WHO WERE GRANTED SOME FORM OF REIEF. CONUICTION OVERTURNED, ETC.
THE TRUTH NEVER CHANGES NOMATTER HOW MANY YEARS PASS. BUT LiES ARE CONSTANT HO S3!7 (0Y OW O O HM N Y3ON
)WHY DIO STATES ATTORNEY ViED BRADY LAW OOSNG POLICE POD CAMERA VIDEO THAT PROVES DEFENOANTS INOCENCE AND GPR, GENERAL PROGRESS REPORTS THAT PROUE INNOCENCE
WHY WERE SO MANY AMENDMENTS VIOATED?
VIOATION OF SPEEDYTRIAL
Was the defendant given a fair trial?