When litigating a State Criminal Convictions by way of a Federal Habeas Corpus, the Indigent State Prisoner & Matter What Race, Color or Creed, Who has a State Prison Sentence which is Longer in Years (to serve) than an Actual Human Life Span, is a Party of MCDA Poverty Judging Eve "Disadvantaged Group" (of State Prisoners) a 111 and, (A)3 Who is Entitled Humanely/or Constitutionally; or Not Constitutionally, or Civilly; or Not Civilly, to a Federal Court Appointed Lawyer, Federal Public Defender Being Appointed, Same (As to, But Not Exactly the Same As a Death Sentence, for a Mandated Death Penalty Defense Lawyer, Because that state Prisoner is going to die in a state Prison, As the Sentence is Lower than an Actual Human Life Span?

Can the US Supreme Court find that when litigating a state by way of a federal habeas corpus, the matter of what race, color or creed a state prisoner with a sentence longer than an actual human life span, who is a member of a disadvantaged group, is entitled to a federally appointed lawyer or not civilly