No. 21-6183

In Re Charles Gary Bruce

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-11-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing judicial-bias judicial-misconduct mandamus pro-se
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) When a petitioner makes a prima facie showing of constitutionally impermissible conduct by prosecution, must court hold a -ranks hearing to investigate claims?

2) Is the failure of a court to hold such hearing the type of exceptional circumstance that will warrant mandamus?

3) Do repeated denials of petitioners requests for an evidentiary hearing where petitioner presents sworn statements and iffidavits violate the Code of Conduc t for United States Judges?

4) Does such a violation warrant the extraordinary writ of mandamus to compel courts performance?

5) Where a Judge begins "rubber stamping" Petitioners motions is he violating his Oath to "do equal right to the poor and the ich" especially when Petitioner is proceeding pro se?

3) Do such denials rise to the level of violating Petitioners 5th Amendment Rights to due process?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a petitioner makes a prima facie showing of constitutionally impermissible conduct by prosecution, must court hold a Franks hearing to investigate claims?

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-04
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)

Attorneys

In Re Charles Gary Bruce
Charles Gary Bruce — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent