No. 21-6174
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-precedent standing state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
X Does Tk-e, T~&cA~ TU4- Arlc&^sas dosUs AnyxcXaXc^A \ k 'HO' %O^j /Vnji ] lo-^ r\-] C>\ CJ&) /Vs Xrh ti DiS cr^rh0\C^\/ LovtaUC OCi^. a-r4vre. /Iwd ToD £^-Wv ^ M^saJTicsrr~/Y\ ^T-ns-tacusI 0~f~ BWuJy U)c«<s1a, (Vv<a4o^ S^g. U.S/d^ L, (JQC& O Av\JT Xa PIX: i^r\ StS-S ^{Vv L a- £>va vSi 3^^530 US.H lAyC&eab} ^V^t'Vu.-i-CS LXiaocvv.s4i Vi^kcy^i ^i US eu) R-^vd-er Tlaos e.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Arkansas Code's application of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-49-101 et seq. deprive necessary parties of due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2021-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Antonio Smith
Antonio Smith — Petitioner
Arkansas