1) Whether Material exculpatory evidence against Petitioner his in LA California Prison at the time those allegations were lodged against him reflects actual innocence of Sexual assault the

2) Whether Petitioners Trial counsels awa admission of his efforts to exercise due diligence by failure to Present exculpatory evidence that would have exonerated him, Ineffective assistance of Counsel 3

3) Whether Trial Court and the Federal Courts Failure to hold evidentiary hearing as to Petitioners actual innocence, the Petitioner possessed the material evidence violation of the Canon Codes and abuse of Powers, a Violation of the 6D and 14ED amendment Pe

4) Whether the state and Trial Judge responsible for Conspiracy in Providing defendant with a public defender whom Conspired together with each other to keep out Concrete evidence of Violation Petitioner's (440) Amend?

5) Whether the Federal and Federal Judges Speculating their'd in taken inher testimonies on abuse of discretion and chased the trial Precedis 2

Whether Petitioner's exculpatory evidence claims reflect actual innocence of sexual assault