No. 21-6150
Jacques S. Gholston v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights fourth-amendment illinois-v-caballes police-investigation rodriguez-v-united-states time-extension traffic-stop unreasonable-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a traffic stop unreasonably prolonged beyond the time needed to address the purpose of the stop violates the Fourth Amendment regardless of when, chronologically, the delay occurs?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a traffic stop unreasonably prolonged beyond the time needed to address the purpose of the stop violates the Fourth Amendment regardless of when, chronologically, the delay occurs?
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-01
Reply of petitioner Jacques Gholston filed.
2022-02-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-01-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 22, 2022.
2022-01-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 21, 2022 to February 22, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 21, 2022.
2021-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2021 to January 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-22
Response Requested. (Due December 22, 2021)
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Jacques Gholston
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent