No. 21-6092
Earvin R. Davis v. Connie Horton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment charging-instruments civil-action constitutional-rights conviction-and-sentence due-process judicial-procedure minor minor-imprisonment
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
DID THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATE PETITIONER DAVIS'S 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS WHEN THEY USED A CIVIL ACTION TO IMPRISON HIM AS A MINOR?
II.
DID THE TRIAL COURT & MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE PETITIONER DAVIS'S 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS WHEN THEY REFUSED TO GIVE BINDING EFFECT TO THE NOTICE PETITIONER WAS GIVEN IN HIS CHARGING INSTRUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PRINCIPAL SUSPECT-MATTER?
III.
DID THE TRIAL COURT & MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE PETITIONER'S 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS WHEN THEY REFUSED TO VACATE HIS CONVICTION & SENTENCE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court violate petitioner's 14th Amendment right to due process?
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent Connie Horton, Warden to respond filed.
2021-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Connie Horton, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Earvin R. Davis
Earvin R. Davis — Petitioner