DID THE LOWER COURT ERR WHEN THEY REFUSED TO APPLY THIS COURT'S
PRECEDENT IN BRUTON V. UNITED STATES, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) WHEN THE
CO-CONSPIRATOR / CO-DEFENDANT (MURCHISON) REFUSED TO BE CROSS-
-EXAMINED AFTER HE TESTIFIED AND IMPLICATED DANIELS IN THE CRIME?

DID THE LOWER COURT ERR WHEN IT HELD THAT BRUTON DOES NOT APPLY
TO A CO-DEFENDANT WHO PLEADS GUILTY BEFORE THE OTHER
CO-DEFENDANTS GO TO TRIAL?

Did the lower court err when they refused to apply this court's precedent in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) when the co-conspirator / co-defendant (Murchison) refused to be cross-examined after he testified and implicated Daniels in the crime?