No. 21-6079
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: art-canon civil-rights due-process judicial-bias judicial-procedure mandamus mandamus-order oregon-law pro-se standing supreme-court
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment FourthAmendment DueProcess Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment FourthAmendment DueProcess Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Q)l. Is the maxim advised to the Oregon Supreme Courts mandamus order pre-discretionary to disposition concerning a judicial body's bias and awe inspiring to an unapprised public minds conception of the art portrayed in the gift canon Jonah?
Q) 2. Truth or destruction?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the maxim advised to the Oregon Supreme Courts mandamus order pre-discretionary to disposition concerning a judicial body's bias and awe inspiring to an unapprised public minds conception of the art portrayed in the gift canon Jonah?
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2021-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Austin Brand
Austin Brand — Petitioner
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent