Whether a putative claim under 42 U.S.C. §1985(2), clause 2 for obstruction of justice in a state proceeding, like state judicial foreclosure action, is jurisdictional, because of its special jurisdiction provision 28 U.S.C. §1343(a)(l), so that a federal court or judge must sua sponte raise it and/or if imperfectly raised by a plaintiff pro se who is also an attorney giving the federal court or judge actual notice before dismissing an action at the pleading stage?

Whether the Court will also accept a petition for writ of certiorari because the first question presented is very important and when it overlaps the federal and state claims that establish a new imperfectly raised putative §1985(2), clause 2 claim to resolve an intra-circuit split in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit between School District 1J Mutlnomah Cty, OR v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) and In re Glenfed Inc. Sec. Litig., 42 F.3d 1541, 1551 ( 9th Cir. 1994)(en banc) on the issue whether voluminous records is cause for a dismissal of an action at the pleading stage?

Whether a putative claim under 42 U.S.C. §1985(2)