and Fraudulent imprisonment under a falsified document?

The state imprisoned mr. Watson past the l25 month maximum sentence ordered in the zoo5 Original Judgment. Does the constitution afford protection to convicts from being incarcerated past the maximum sentence allowed by law?

3.Does the constitution protecta defendant-supervisee from frand, Obstruction of Justice i and Conspiracy during court proceedings?

any process for post -release supervision, (pes). Is a parole warrant accused of a crime while on pRs?

5 Mr, Watson was subjected to involuntary servitude as a pretrial detaine Does a parole warrant alone sanetion this treatment?

Does the constitution protect defendant-superviseesfrom the breach of an to be free from punishment until convicted or due process satistied?

8. When a state habeas petitioner is afforded counsel by state statut. is prejudice presumed under strickland v Washingtan, when the court the petifioner is allowed to proceed pro se withont a waiverof counsel?

9.Is a defendant -Supervisee protected under the constitution when leading to trial?

before the Respondents disclosed any discovery to Mr.Watsons Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents. Does this comport with the usual andaccepted courre of judicial procedings?

13. The U.S.Court of Appeals did not address : (1) Initial Motion To Amend Pleading for additional relief and review July 8,2021 opinion, (2)Interro gatories and Request for Production of Dochments to Respondents September 82orl order and (3) entitlement to review of Ground Three right to counsel claim supported by the record.Septmber 8,2u2l order, Does this comport with the usual and accepted course of judicial proceedings?

14. At the November 16,2017 state habeas hearing Mr. Watson's origi nal habeas Application was concealed, as the record reflects, Is a filed motion essential to a fulland fair hearing and opport to be heard when that motion come.s on for hearing?

15. Does the constitution protect habeas petitioner's from these arbitrat actions of the government?

16. Mr. Watson was released from prison to PRS on April16, 2015 and Charged with new crimes on December29,2016, which resulfed in "parallel proceedings"regarding PRS felony offenses/zols Judament (2005 Judament) and the 2016 each of wuhich were subject to due process requisites. Does the state's premature and wrongful termination of pks preclude review of the zous Judgmnent in this case?

17. In response to Mr. Watson's Ground One claim in his FHP. the Kespondent's defense was to attribute Mr. Watson's loss o of liberty to the 2uos Judgment. Does a fraudulent claim

Does the U.S. Constitution protect a convict from imprisonment under a falsified document?