No. 21-6046
Jacques Lisbey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commerce-clause constitutional-challenge felon-in-possession firearm-possession firearms interstate-commerce second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2021-11-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face and as-applied because Congress lacks the power under the Commerce Clause to criminalize the possession of a firearm by a felon simply because the firearm had travelled across state lines at one time.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Jacques Lisbey
John Paul Balazs — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent