No. 21-6030

Keith Elmo Davis v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-10-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process jurisdiction mcgirt-decision post-conviction-relief procedural-defenses retroactivity standing subject-matter-jurisdiction teague-exception tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER RESPONDENT WAIVED/FORFEITED ANY OF IT'S PROCEDURAL
DEFENSES IN McGIRT 'S DECISION AND RESPONDENT IS PROCEDURALLY
BARRED FROM ASSERTING ANY IF IT'S PREVIOUS PROCEDURAL DEFENSES
THAT WERE AVAILABLE AGAINST PETITIONER 'S SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION CLAIM IN COLLATERAL POST CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS
WHEN CONVICTON WAS FINAL?

WHETHER McGIRT V. OKLAHOMA ANNOUNCED A NEW VINDICATIVE
REPLACEMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RULE DICTATED BY PRIOR PRECEDENT
MADE RETROACTIVE BY TEAGUE 'S EXCEPTION TO NON-RETROACTIVITY?
WHICH RESPONDENT REFUSED TO APPLY RETROACTIVELY AS STATE
POSTCONVICTION RELIEF TO CASES FINAL WHEN McGIRT WAS DECIDED ON
JULY 09, 2020?

WHETHER LACK OF TRIBES VOLUNTARY CONSENT TO STATE 'S ASSUMPTION
OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE ATEMPTED EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL
POWER BY RESPONDENT WITHOUT TRIBE 'S CONSENT IS VOID?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether respondent waived/forfeited procedural defenses

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Keith E. Davis
Keith Elmo Davis — Petitioner