No. 21-6023
Dina Elizabeth Guardado v. Eric Aldridge, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
IaHu* did Mr. Prices Kosh
Sta±H Oct t&ui&n Clsu^
Shock Svd donS ShcSS MlC^durUS CI
9
d Hood IS it tfaut hC- UJOJS
asSi^neJ to bs m-i court
(tffoud&l Mty\ RuU- tM
{{alts oh processioned
(see Attached bUd)
did Mr. Pn.cs -Koch
'fUC-Shcon hr-ehjLT ^ na Untcs K3 .
Jt Mr. OihcJblcSS -tkhurh? hoot:
-tfJL CJ&nSfo^S Q IaK£KS
-tfrdL CrurSS ?SthhS ■
1/iXS
iMd
do urn
fytdo CSCor
KdnM did he stock
oh V/?. dtP Morut l fH
Whlrv S-bsJ iaJOcS admtHc.'Oia
W<rv~ortA ui rotten -the. Lottery
oh ~tP\. Pl2. LunJkS £r>~dl
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court-appointed lawyer violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to investigate the allegations and by interfering with the investigation
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Eric Aldridge to respond filed.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Dina Elizabeth Guardado
Dina Elizabeth Guardado — Petitioner
Eric Aldridge
Michelle Shane Kallen — Virginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent