No. 21-602
Michigan Education Association Family Retired Staff Association, et al. v. Michigan Education Association, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: benefit-vesting civil-rights cnh-industrial-v-reese contract-ambiguity contract-interpretation employee-benefits erisa extrinsic-evidence plan-interpretation retiree-medical-plan vesting
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a retiree medical plan that is ambiguous on its face, within the meaning enunciated in CNH Industrial v Reese, 138 S. Ct. 761 (2018), may be shown by extrinsic evidence to provide for vesting of post-retirement benefits.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a retiree medical plan that is ambiguous on its face may be shown by extrinsic evidence to provide for vesting of post-retirement benefits
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan Education Association, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Michigan Education Association Family Retired Staff Association, et al.
Andrew Wayne Stumpff — Butzel Long, Petitioner
Michigan Education Association, et al.