No. 21-6019
James Paul Arlotta v. His Holiness Pope Francis, et al.
IFP
Tags: appearances-of-impropriety bankruptcy-court civil-rights conflicts-of-interest constitutional-questions court-jurisdiction due-process establishment-clause judicial-proceedings legal-review recusal
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court will adhere to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment in light of the apparent conflicts of interest and impropriety involving the Diocese of Buffalo, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Vatican City State
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2021)
Attorneys
James Paul Arlotta
James P. Arlotta — Petitioner