Did the Tenth Circuit, on review of the denial of Petitioner's motion to suppress, err in holding that the search warrant affidavit provided adequate basis for probable cause to believe evidence of child pornography would be found at Petitioner's new address when the affidavit merely described the subject images as "child exploitation," and relied on an undated prior conviction for child pornography, and did not explain the connection between the suspected criminal activity at Mr. Kilgore's old address and his new address?

Did the Tenth Circuit err in holding that the search warrant affidavit provided adequate basis for probable cause?