Jose Miguel Ramirez-Rodriguez v. United States
-1-he. Scolcnce 4he Tudge (kiitheia Moo fez) eae d vivre Aan 4-14e Guedelmes Rom mord-)15- 4's on error sloe broke 4-he )sol rules -(4/Jere_ 7) -tkie yuche d kW- couvri- -hie -3 Voiii-1-5 recludions. 2- cor pl ecdhil 6 Li CO poilq+ or +-he senkence. She clicivi'4- seduce 4-heitvi
3) M'/ -(onies - frown Luke It, 2005. are mom +flan 15 ears, She does lickve -F0 coud - she, does oa--Couo-1- o4tier Feopk ) M y .p loSile5 are 54-0-fr, nos 4era I
Ty/ jiisl here for tie—ea 131 Ben r terf IPS an itou,5-kce- on.ths . 51qe 3Que ime
-the -3-ild3e othaek Niored Wos. Ikcludg5 p2i.in-i-s to ever/014e_ 6ecause ac (Dv—M-19. 61,11- 4-0 ime • was she itYd C is + 30 ilLrf )11e a
wet on -1-he e c13 e de ci-Fh ie e- v4 i n e cl . j+ Cokhd— 19. cod T . liGcl .y)o p on 1-he_ GE(. 4. -FX 71115 IsQn 4--here. !Medical eecoo -d. tokere I -ex toiclin for belp or)ci
(Ackd nonce fiallY bad.
9) a tmiowr Cause 1. poiY14 01. and she. -3-ave_ une.. po
ft))/ imivor- CauSei ctnci.
04/ feIonie from Zo05 and oduidiv-i- becaus-e .
1,00c Ck )on 9 -11vt4e cs30. been }/14c)a_ --tho n 15. 110+
Whether the sentencing court erred in its application of the Sentencing Guidelines