DEPRIVATIONS OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS, FAILURE TO APPOINT COUNSEL TO ADA PETITIONER WITH 8TH GRADE COGNITIVE FUNCTION PREDICATED PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS DEFICIENCY I.E. SUMMARY DISMISSAL FOR SECOND AND SUCCESSIVE PETITION.

II. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FAILURE TO APPOINT COUNSEL IN DETERMINING DUE PROCESS QUESTION IS A CASUAL LINK TO TRIAL COURT STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCY THAT MENTAL ILLNESS INQUIRY WOULD HAVE INSPIRED COUNSEL TO COMPEL THE DISTRICT COURT WITH.

III. WHETHER THE JURY WAS QUALIFIED IMPARTIAL IN DETERMINING "WHEN IS A CRIME NOT CONSIDERED PREMEDITATION" PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODES 403 AND 780, IN TOTALITY OF THE RECORD IN TRANSACTIONS.

IV. WHETHER A NAPUE VIOLATION CONSISTENT WITH RECENT DISTRICT COURT PRECEDENCE COMBINED WITH A IMPARTIAL JURY DEPRIVATION BRECHT, SUPRA A EASY CLAIM SATISFIES THE UNUSUAL CASE' DETERMINATION WARRANTING HABEAS RELIEF.

SHOULD DETERMINE RE FORMATIVE PRECEDENCE ESTABLISHED IN LAW T.E: STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCY IN TRIAL, POST TRIAL, PROCEDURE AND ANALYSIS

Whether the cumulative effect of deprivations of equal protection of laws, failure to appoint counsel, and procedural due process deficiency issues resulted in dismissal