Angela Michelle Morelli v. Joshua B. Hyman, et al.
DueProcess
1. Why are Womens ' Constitutional Rights being violated under the 14th
Amendment, for both procedural Due Process and Life, Liberty and Property,
legally across the Nation?
How is it that any other criminal matter regarding violence or theft, would be
reviewed in a "procedural due process hearing " orally and materially prior to a
judgement, and prior to being sent to a civil dispute, other than Domestic
Violence Cases involving a child?
Why is it that the tactical advantage in this manner that is violating Due Process
and resulting in the removal of Life, Liberty or Property of the victim allowed,
when the law clearly states throughout the Nation that it is detrimental for the
child to not be in the custody of the perpetrator, then removing the victim from the
child, placing the perpetrator in control of the court's opinion, resulting in
Domestic Relations that cannot and will not be heard in a Federal Court
Jurisdiction, even when the issue is not custody, but the violations of the
Constitution's 14th Amendment that occurred in the court proceedings?
If false "hearsay " evidence was used and the victim proved with material
evidence that it wasn 't true, and a 1970 text message was the very next text
claimed by the perpetrator after the assault and the victim was of color, would
they be heard in Federal Court? If the victim did not have a child with the
perpetrator and the same a previous statement occured, would they be heard in
Federal Court?
2. Why is it detrimental for not only the child involved in Domestic Violence, the
courts influence on the community in both the present and the future, but also the
individual rights of the victim of physical, sexual, financial, verbal and religious
assault on a Constitutional level?
Why are Women's Constitutional Rights being violated under the 14th Amendment, for both procedural Due Process and Life, Liberty and Property?