WHETHER THE KANSAS STATE COURT FINDING THAT PETITIONER SENT
ENCE IS NOT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE, A ABUSE OF DISCRETION REPUGNANT TO
THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMEND
MENT PROTECTIONS IN SENTENCING PHASE?. 1.I.

WHETHER THE KANSAS STATE COURTS WITHHOLDING OF ITS DISPARITY
IN SENTENCE BENEFITS FROM PETITIONER, AMOUNT TO THE DENIAL OF EQUAL
PROTECTIONS OF THE LAW, THUS REPUGNANT TO THE 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE
U.S.C.A.? ;II.

WHETHER PETITIONER REMAINING IMPRISONED ON CRIMES COMMITTED III.
,BY CODEFENDANTS, THAT KANSAS. STATE ,COURTS HAVE LONG SINCE RELIEVED
OF THE PUNISHMENT IMPOSED, BASED UPON FALSE & UNTRUE INFORMATION,
(ABUSE OF DISCRETION) AND AFOUL TO THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DUE
PROCESS OF THE LAW, EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND RIGHT TO A
SPEEDY TRIAL, RENDER THE SENTENCE A FUNDAMENTAL MANIFEST MISCARRI-
AGE OF JUSTICE?

whether-the-kansas-state-court-finding-that-petitioner-sentence-is-not-an-illegal-sentence-is-an-abuse-of-discretion-repugnant-to-the-due-process-clause