No. 21-593
Priscilla Everette-Oates v. Beth Wood, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights civil-rights-action conspiracy due-process evidence-concealment immunity municipal-immunity municipal-liability prosecutorial-immunity section-1983 summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
In a claim alleging conspiracy to conceal evidence against a public official who was falsely charged with embezzlement, can multiple municipal defendants win summary judgment solely on the basis that one defendant has prosecutorial immunity and was otherwise deemed not liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can municipal defendants win summary judgment solely on the basis that one defendant has prosecutorial immunity and was otherwise deemed not liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent Beth Wood, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Beth Wood, et al.
Brian Rabinovitz — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent
Priscilla Everette-Oates
Stephen Bergstein — Bergstein & Ullrich, Petitioner