No. 21-5921
Shikisha Monet Tidmore v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: admissibility constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement-statements legality pre-trial-investigation sixth-amendment trial-counsel voluntariness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Petitioner's constitutional rights have been violated under the United States Constitution VI Amendment where Petitioner was denied due process and ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial counsel failed to conduct basic pre-trial investigation into the statements that Petitioner made to Officer Corstage and Detective Knight. Additionally, trial counsel failed to challenge the voluntariness, legality, and admissibility of those statements made.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's constitutional rights have been violated under the United States Constitution VI Amendment
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Shikisha Monet Tidmore
Shikisha Monet Tidmore — Petitioner