No. 21-5920

In Re Jason Brooks

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-10-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence aedpa constitutional-vagueness due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction securities-act suspension-clause vagueness
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

(i) Whether a freestanding claim of actual innocence can overcome AEDPA's gatekeeping provisions and/or whether a prisoner may be entitled to federal habeas relief based on a freestanding claim of actual innocence?

(2) Whether the State of Colorado had the power to enter the conviction or impose the sentence in this case, including:

(a) Whether Brooks was involved in selling securities?

(b) Whether the State of Colorado had jurisdiction to indict Brooks?

(c) Whether criminal enforcement of the Colorado Securities Act ("CSA") is unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and is criminalizing otherwise innocent conduct?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a freestanding claim of actual innocence can overcome AEDPA's gatekeeping provisions and/or whether a prisoner may be entitled to federal habeas relief based on a freestanding claim of actual innocence

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-28
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Jason Brooks
Jason Brooks — Petitioner