Whether the Petitioner is supposed to perform discovery when only has consent, not grade special education education?

Does the Petitioner's First Amendment violated because he was shown retaliation fees speech when the Defendants specs him to chemical agents twice dust cause he was tall in a?

How are offender two cells down from the unless something is trying to be hidden. Has he video footage there of been produced and viewed by court?

Does own power to have the video court is evidence produced as vital to case thereof?

Is the defendant violating counsel when counsel obviously needed?

Does the Defendant violate Coleman having fering against?

How come all through is policy mental health mesic pret clin chia agents there used on an offender that was nothing winning counsel for anyone else?

What would helped Petitioners case in also self pecting in elli erste?

Can the defendants counsel be found as acting the video footage there of an?

Can of pieces be an passed across is continue to use awred algass it?

How to eg alc tsk een chemed ole seal on woman well in a closed area?

If the chemical ages can clearly shales done use on humans, do nat used in clocks croce used trial should support malice right in in raaelo lag iment?

Do you think it would have been produced to bull ton barre syndrome tha weak respiratory to pasemtael tho being lnc by iach a saved uirce with more thin acne second?

Could abe clee es diny fact findee dl malice foasanissuz hece thus a6 am mr TABOR wes pled in an observation tell eh tole a slai luoithits 0107 corser fe ps protection?

Does child adios caan crab also receive elie from his illegal conviction of helactual offender?

Is only a high time offender worth previous convictions for no violent offences expunged from his record the doce mo 442949 cutll of me3adcor ovisianet?

Have the courts gave me TABOR notice back on motion for discovery interrogatories needed to gate the defendants counsel if he filed prem dh the courts dhs?

Whether the petitioner's First Amendment rights were violated due to retaliation for his speech when the defendants used chemical agents against him