1. How is it possible for a black person to have constitutional rights to be treated EQUAL to a white person's rights, privileges, benefits and advantages if we consider the following fact. Blacks are the ONLY race of people in America setup systematically by design for centuries to this very day to live as the permanent underclass stripped of a place of refuge to call their own to rule, govern and be free. They live in a society and government that generally knows that there is a genuine devastation to black lives SOLELY historically until this day and of numerical disproportionate social struggles that coerces the national racial divide. However the district federal court totally refuses to use all within its power to the very limits of the law to grant a black person (plaintiff) justice. In doing so not only is plaintiff denied justice, but ALL blacks of America are being denied justices.
1a. If ONLY blacks are devastated in this UNIQUE way above, how can they EVER overcome a society that utterly denies the above situation and grants so-called justice to an entire group of people called "minority" without ever singling out help for the black only oppression condition?
1b. How can blacks prevent utter devastation when the roots of oppression are deeply woven into the fabric core of our nation? If is so vast that white cops consistently MURDER unarmed INNOCENT black people and can go totally free often PROMOTED, while in fact NEVER nationally known has a black cop MURDERED an innocent unarmed white person and gone TOTALLY FREE, skip the idea of a promotion, yet there's a debate among the masses that blacks are now equal to whites. Is it possible that the federal court thinks the same as this minority members of society above who believe blacks are now equal as why no special consideration was allowed for plaintiff regarding the racial divide resulting in all motions of late denied to plaintiff and all motions of defendants granted?
1c. How can plaintiff receive a fair litigation DENIED discovery and PUNISHED for her delay in further cooperation with defendants to get their discovery (the deposition) when she is not allowed ANY GENUINE DISCOVERY REGARDING DISCRIMINATION the primary subject of her case? Note: the great detail that plaintiff cooperated in answering all production, interrogatories, and admissions while plaintiff got ZERO on discovery regarding how blacks were treated in comparison to whites. How can this NOT be seen SUBSTANCIAL DENIAL OF DISCOVERY when the entire case is about discrimination and no discovery is allowed on that subject? Note: this case is the equivalent to David and Goliath, the court saw that plaintiff cooperated fully and that the defense did not, but she continued to hound plaintiff even at the last meeting telling plaintiff to answer every question even if it is fishing she was not encouraged to a right to object. But the defendants were objecting to everything. This was extreme attempt to try to help the defendants extract an unfair advantage fishing expedition.
2. How can a pro se litigant be heard in a court of law as REQUIRED by the constitution when it is unconstitutionally REQUIRED by the court and defendant's attorney that the litigant uses words/terminology and presents facts as if a lawyer even though in lay terms what is being said and presented is reasonably understood by the average perons?
3. In 2021, why should a Federal Court be biased against a near elderly disabled black person who is MALICIOUSLY discriminated against and grant favor to the lawyer and corporation with no way to be heard for the pro se litigant?
4. Will the Supreme Court do all within its power by law to PUSH TOWARDS THE REALITY THAT black people are to be treated equal to white people and to HONOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES to
Whether a black person can be treated equally to white persons in terms of constitutional rights, privileges, benefits, and advantages, given the fact that blacks have been systematically oppressed for centuries