1. WHETHER, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Abused its discretion, erred
and Deprived Petitioners of To A Fair and Just Trial/RIGHT TO DUE
PROCESS by determining that Petitioners ' Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
is Frivolous concluding, denying, and dismissing Petitioners ' Appeal as being
Frivolous and Moot?

2. WHETHER, the Eastern District Court 's Chief Judge erred and Abused her
Discretion and deprived Petitioners a Fair and Just Trial/ RIGHT TO DUE\
PROCESS within the court by fully Adopting and Ordering the Magistrate
Judge 's findings and recommendations on July17,2020; and Entry of Judgment
on July 20, 2020?

3. WHETHER. Respondent, Uduak Inyang Oduok Abused her Discretion and
violated Petitioner 's Right To A Fair and Just Trial/RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS
by failing to RECUSE herself after knowing that she was a Defendant In a
Federal Court Case and Petitioner previously had Filed with the Sacramento
Superior Court a typed request for his Recusal?

4. WHETHER. Respondent, Superior Court Family Law Judge John Patrick Winn
Abused his Discretion and violated Petitioners ' Right To A Fair Trial/RIGHT TO
DUE PROCESS and Just trial by failing to RECUSE himself after knowing that
he was a Defendant In a Federal Court Case that Petitioner/Carina Conerly had
previously Filed in the Sacramento Superior Court a typed request for his Recusal?

5. WHETHER. Respondent, Superior Court Judge Olubunmi Olaide Awoniyi
Abused her Discretion and violated Petitioner 's Right To A Fair and Just Trial/
RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, after Petitioner Carina Conerly pleaded to her for
the Recusal in order to disallow Petitioners ' case not to be heard, decided, ruled
upon, and handled by Winn and the Judge Olubunmi Olaide Awoniyi refused?

6. WHETHER. Respondent, Sharif Roldan Tarpin violated Rules of Civil Procedures
and Petitioners ' Right To A Fair and Just Trial/RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS by
agreeing and taking part in interfering into Petitioners ' Family Law case to rid,
distract, and stop Petitioners ' case from going forward and exercising their
RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?

7. WHETHER, the Eastern District denied Petitioners ' Requests For Default against
Respondents, the denial violated Petitioners ' Right To A Fair and Just
Trial/RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?

8. WHETHER. Superior Court Family Law Judge John Patrick Winn 's Court Order
Violated Petitioner Carina Conerly 's Constitutional First Amendment Right to
Video in a public place and if she did video, he stated and Ordered that she could
be guilty and liable for Civil and Legal Prosecution?

9. WHETHER. Superior Court Family Law Judge John Patrick Winn 's Court Order
Violated Petitioner Carina Conerly 's Constitutional 5th Amendment Rights to
remain silent when he made an Order telling her what to say and specific words to
say to Respondent Sharif Roldan Tarpin?

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals abused its discretion