No. 21-5878
Linaker Charlemagne v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing newly-discovered-evidence self-defense service-of-process
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether District Court, departed from essential requirements of law, by not perfecting
service on Petitioner in a timely manner, which denied constitutional rights of due
process.
2. Whether Petitioner was denied right to conflict free counsel at Evidentiary hearing on
Newly Discovered Evidence.
3. Whether Petitioner 's case was a true self defense, based on sworn affidavit, of Cedric
Johnson, sidebar conferences, evidence and investigative reports.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether District Court departed from essential requirements of law by not perfecting service on Petitioner in a timely manner, which denied constitutional rights of due process
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Linaker Charlemagne
Linaker Charlemagne — Petitioner