I.

WHETHER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN AND THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, HEREIN RULED FALSEHOODS AND "FRAUD ON THE COURT" WHICH CREATE A MAJOR LEGAL CONFLICT, WITH U.S. V. RYAN, 7TH F.3D 998, 1006, 107 GOR. 2013) PROVIDES?

II.

WHETHER PETITIONER IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES WHICH VIOLATE PETITIONER'S 4TH AND 5TH AMENDMENTS' RIGHTS TO BE FREE OF "POLICE CORRUPTION" HAPPENING ON FEBRUARY 5TH, 2019 OF CORRUPT DETECTIVE KOIVISTO (6396) AND STATE ATTORNEY SHORTSTEIN'S ILLEGALITY OF 1985) STRETCHES TOO FAR (2012 OF KOIVISTO WANTING TO KILL U.S. PRESIDENT OBAMA AND) ENFORCER RELIES ON THE ARREST INITIALLY ALSO WE THIS COURT".

III.

WHETHER CORRUPT DETECTIVE KOIVISTO (6396) AND HEAD STATE ATTORNEY HARRY SHORTSTEIN GUILTY OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT? THRU CORRUPT DETECTIVE KOIVISTO (6396) WITHOUT SEARCH WARRANT AND AFFIDAVIT EVERY LUMINA CHEVY AND INEFFECTIVE FOR NO FUTURE TO UTILIZE "NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE APPENDIX 135A, WAS CAUSED BY 135A OF PETITIONER WRITING THE "FLORIDA BAR" ON HIM?

IV.

WHETHER GOVERNMENT DEPRIVE PETITIONER OF FEDERAL LAW BOOKS IN 2005-2008) LULLED PETITIONER INTO INACTION SEE APPENDIX 129A-130A AND PRISON OFFICIALS' GOT LEXIS NEXIS LAW LIBRARY SEARCH ENGINES (MARCH 2016) RATION, WITH DETECTIVE KOIVISTO (6396) AND ATTORNEY SHORTSTEIN AS A COVER-UP, OF THE OFFICERS PUBLIC CORRUPTION PRACTICES' AND PATTERNS', CALLS FOR A REVAMP OF THE LAW RULED?

V.

FOR THIS COURT TO INVOKE ITS SUPERVISORY POWER, AND GRANT TO HAVE THIS COURT REVIEW THE MERIT FOR THO COURT TO INVOKE ITS SUPERVISORY POWER, AND GRANT ATTRIBUTED, AND DISCOVERS, ALLOWS THO COURT TO PUT A EMBARGO ON THE UNFAIRNESS, AND CARELESSNESS, AND DISCRIMINATORY PATTERNS AND PRACTICES, THAT S.CT. BULLO 2, ALLOWS S.CT. JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, AND OTHER JUSTICES TO CORRECT THE WRONGDONE?

Whether the U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioner's claims of 'fraud on the court' and created a major legal conflict with U.S. v. Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38, 47 (1998)