No. 21-5858
Enrique E. Quintana v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence collateral-attack commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure indictment indictment-deficiency plea-agreement waiver
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can a defendant who claims actual innocence after entering a plea agreement be barred from raising his actual innocence claim based on a Plea Agreement Waiver?
Does a fatally deficient indictment overcome a Plea Agreement waiver to restrict a defendant's ability to collaterally attack his conviction?
Can a Commerce Clause regulation be maintained as Constitutional under the aggregate market effect of Gonzales v. Raich when it is shown that there is no National Market to effect?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
actual-innocence,plea-agreement,waiver,indictment,collateral-attack,commerce-clause,gonzales-v-raich
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Enrique E. Quintana
Enrique Quintana — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent