1) WhEthEr VEl NoN, Sup ume Conts Alsbama's decisions, timeliness.ob stuicling Challenges, Petitionen's Ancillany REOMaINS "cantany to" on AN "UNhEASONAbl applicatior Federal loor, vi2, ob Chenaly established Its JTune 16t1 2021 Notwithstanding Orden MISAPPRENSION OB ts Harston is Lack s_ ANd Dfs Eftectontions o6 pettromen's petetror being ofteaunse timelp-under hu208 44 milbox-nale, wher delureed to tothontres ref Legyl mins, delivey poeposes to A dedline, not grg CorsiderntoN S M se plenengs, o MI Interests D Tustice, Hases under vs Kennedoctame, i too $ra 11 And

2) Whether Vel Non, PRMISEd UPON Federnl kles B Eviderce - Role 201(d)-Is that o6 hecondPettroner's ANclay pedicate folly squnnely yet pouppy And fouly, bot for the Cleanly Stnle Aomllate ELAONCOUS tith chilling BUUBN Hbustor 1s a 187 15266 (1983 6a0, That detitronen's Jovesile DN Jodgment RMINS aepognant He U. 5 Const, 4 T 14h1 Anend merts, IpISONMeNT SI Amsdmet prohlohens 974513 as see 28 USC52241 (13) tater AliA. $

Whether the New York ban on carrying firearms in public for self-defense violates the Second Amendment