Whether the South Carolina Supreme Court error to akfirm the trial Coust's suling where the trial Court was convinced by the Sthte's 'thired-party guilt theory that al Aimin wes guilty: deried and diminith al- Amin's attenpt to prove his innocence, a constitutional right to present a complete dekense grounded in Due Process, Confrontation; and Compulsory Process.

Whether the South Carolina Supreme Court erred in concluding that the trial court's decision to exclude the testimony of the defendant's expert witness violated the defendant's constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause and the Compulsory Process Clause