No. 21-5813
Anthony Foster v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-approach general-verdict habeas-proceeding harmless-error-review predicate-offenses Stromberg-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Should the categorical approach be used in a habeas proceeding to evaluate which of several predicate offenses support a jury's general verdict?
(2) After Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57 (2008) are all Stromberg errors subject to harmless error review?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the categorical approach be used in a habeas proceeding to evaluate which of several predicate offenses support a jury's general verdict?
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Anthony Foster
Randee Jill Golder — Randee J. Golder, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent