No. 21-5800

Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. Idaho

Lower Court: Idaho
Docketed: 2021-09-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: atkins-standard Atkins-v-Virginia clinical-assessment clinical-standards conflict-between-lower-courts constitutional-interpretation criminal-sentencing death-penalty intellectual-disability national-concern sub-average-intellectual-functioning
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), require the use of clinical standards for the determination of sub-average intellectual functioning?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Atkins v. Virginia require the use of clinical standards for the determination of sub-average intellectual functioning?

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-10-28
Brief of respondent Idaho in opposition filed.
Main DocumentOtherProof of Service
2021-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr.
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Idaho
L. LaMont Anderson — Idaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent