No. 21-5787
IFP
Tags: civil-rights compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-procedure federal-sentencing habeas-corpus parole sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
ERISA
ERISA
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whethe the prima fai requiement in 28uss 2244() wud funtion
enn renen ennt f a sentn ot ld l dee etio
of nelease or paude.
2). Whether 28 usc 246 3C) woud funtien as a sespenion of Habeas
Coaus to ban declaraton qudgment and injunctive relief to enjin repondents
enfrcement of suntence in sxoss to maimum statuton determinate antence
and not allomed by lauw, to depnue Pestitionn of releane on poude.
. Whethe a6 usc 2r4 could time ban declanaton juedmert andinunctive
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 28 U.S.C. §2254 would function as a recognition of habeas corpus jurisdiction, declaring judgment and injunctive relief to enjoin respondents' enforcement of a sentence not allowed by law, and deprive petitioner of release on parole
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-01
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Randall T. McArty
Randall T. McArty — Petitioner