No. 21-5777
Vance Keith Wilson v. Louisiana
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment bail civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-challenge judicial-discretion pretrial-detention
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is a district court authorized to, sua sponte, but without a Warrant or any quantum of suspicion, order a pretrial defendant, whose bond geemncnas o peci coniti en fnto ct his case?
2. bond?
3. Watitin i nicic as cunditins of releace?
4. I revatdn o o fti anything to suppat the authentioty of the test?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court can, sua sponte and without any question of suspicion, order a pretrial defendant to urinate in front of a bailiff as a condition of continuing their case?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-25
Application (21A337) denied by Justice Alito.
2021-12-27
Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
2021-12-22
Application (21A337) for a stay, submitted to Justice Alito.
2021-11-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2021. See Rule 30.1.
2021-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 24, 2021 to December 24, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-25
Response Requested. (Due November 24, 2021)
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent
Vance K. Wilson
Vance Keith Wilson — Petitioner