Charles Eason v. United States
I.
When the Appellate Court Interprets"Promotion" Of
A Chimical that "Could" be used to Manufacture as
a "Serious Drug" is Remand Required ?
II.
If a defendant's prior conviction was part of
One Continuance Crime Spree "Without" Intervening-
Arrest and further "Consolidated" for one sentencing
purpose,can a court construe the prior as Seperateconvictions based soley on the dates:.the offenses and
prior to any arrest being made or entry of a conviction
to deem the defendant an Armed Career Criminal If Not
is Remand for Resentencing required?
III.
If a State Statute is "Overlybroad ,overlyinclusive','or
indivisble" is it Unconstitutional to apply an enhancement
pursuant to the ACCA 18 U.S.C. §924(e)?
When the Appellate Court of a chemical that 'could' be used to manufacture a 'serious drug' is remand required?