No. 21-5772

Charles Eason v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court armed-career-criminal-act chemical constitutional-challenge conviction criminal-procedure drug-classification drug-manufacturing remand sentencing-enhancement serious-drug statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

I.
When the Appellate Court Interprets"Promotion" Of
A Chimical that "Could" be used to Manufacture as
a "Serious Drug" is Remand Required ?

II.
If a defendant's prior conviction was part of
One Continuance Crime Spree "Without" Intervening-
Arrest and further "Consolidated" for one sentencing
purpose,can a court construe the prior as Seperateconvictions based soley on the dates:.the offenses and
prior to any arrest being made or entry of a conviction
to deem the defendant an Armed Career Criminal If Not
is Remand for Resentencing required?

III.
If a State Statute is "Overlybroad ,overlyinclusive','or
indivisble" is it Unconstitutional to apply an enhancement
pursuant to the ACCA 18 U.S.C. §924(e)?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When the Appellate Court of a chemical that 'could' be used to manufacture a 'serious drug' is remand required?

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Charles Eason
Charles Eason — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent