1) was the Appelate Commissiones justified in dismissing vice of the filed notice of appeal vpan all advesse partieseal, and as it was tre, based on the fact of Respandent not being adverse, they never having appeared in any lower cirault coust proceedings (there belng nore held), nor in the case at all, never having been served or summored the lover circuit coust case hasking been dismissed for want of prosecuton, for lack of service ypon or appearance of Respandent)?

2) Was the Oregan Supreme Coust justified in refusing. to grant review-even thongh the Appellate Commissiones's disimissal was lompletely asbitrary and unjustified by the law?

Was the Appellate Commissioner justified in dismissing Petitioner's appeal on jurisdictional grounds due to lack of service on adverse parties when Petitioner had no adverse parties?