1) Has the Appellate Commission/Court determined Petitioner needed to have Served Respondents on Adverse parties the appeal Understanding his path, Whereas the Respondent's Court did not appear or been in any relevant part in Underlying the appeal having been dismissed prosecution, lack of Service upon Respondents?

2) Was it justified for the Oregon Supreme Court to have refused to review the Appellate Court decision to deem Respondents as Waived - whereas Petitioner Contended that Respondents cannot oppose inevitable withdrawal defendants to the appeal Any obligation to have been timely Served (with a noted of appeal)?

3) Other having I filed his Capacity pleas filed notice of appeal — that neither Respondent adverse party that Myrm lower circuit — able

Was the Appellate Commissioner correct in determining that Petitioner needed to have served Respondents as 'adverse parties' to the appeal?