No. 21-5730

Shikeb Saddozai v. Kristen Esterheld, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction judicial-review section-1983 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42 U.S.C.S.
1983; 1985; 1986; 1988, as well as Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and
Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for relief.

Whether District Court and U.S.Court of Appeals erred in their review that discriminatory treatment existed and
enforced by defendant(s) exclusively against plaintiff
denying Equal Protection Clause and Due Process.

Whether the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals
standard of review was deficient with relevant decisions
of this court and erred denying plaintiff's properly
stated rule of law.

Whether plaintiff demonstrated a "Substantial Showing"
of denial of Constitutional rights of the scope and
effect of the two clauses, Equal Protection and Due
Process, is the same that protect Citizens from
deprivations of life, liberty, or property by the
federal and State governments under the law.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42-U.S.C.S-1983-1985-1986-1988

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Shikeb Saddozai
Shikeb Saddozai — Petitioner