Shikeb Saddozai v. Kristen Esterheld, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42 U.S.C.S.
1983; 1985; 1986; 1988, as well as Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and
Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for relief.
Whether District Court and U.S.Court of Appeals erred in their review that discriminatory treatment existed and
enforced by defendant(s) exclusively against plaintiff
denying Equal Protection Clause and Due Process.
Whether the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals
standard of review was deficient with relevant decisions
of this court and erred denying plaintiff's properly
stated rule of law.
Whether plaintiff demonstrated a "Substantial Showing"
of denial of Constitutional rights of the scope and
effect of the two clauses, Equal Protection and Due
Process, is the same that protect Citizens from
deprivations of life, liberty, or property by the
federal and State governments under the law.
Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42-U.S.C.S-1983-1985-1986-1988