No. 21-5709
Miguel Gonzalez v. Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-error legal-precedent mccoy-v-louisiana retroactivity supreme-court supreme-court-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Supreme Court, Superior Court and trial Court commit reversible error when they held that a new constitutional right was not created by the Supreme Court's decision in McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018)?
a. SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES
2. Did the Supreme Court, Superior Court and trial Court commit reversible error when they held that the holding in McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018) was not retroactive.
a. SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Supreme Court, Superior Court and trial Court commit reversible error in their holdings regarding the retroactivity and creation of a new constitutional right under McCoy v. Louisiana
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Miguel Gonzalez
Miguel Gonzalez — Petitioner