No. 21-5702

Ronald Webster v. Scott Dauffenbach, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-right constitutional-rights district-court habeas-corpus jurists-of-reason procedural-ruling procedural-rulings
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals Erred by failing to Issue a Certificate of Appealability (COA) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A), because Webster can show both "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals erred in failing to issue a Certificate of Appealability

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)

Attorneys

Ronald Webster
Ronald L. Webster — Petitioner