Did the Lower Courts err in failing to recognize the discrimination against Petitioner, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities and Rehabilitation Acts, based on Respondents' arbitrary confiscation and retention of Petitioner's long used and needed accommodations (his prosthetic leg and handheld rescue inhaler) for his undisputed disabilities, based on a blanket policy of jail seizure at booking, with no individual assessment or consideration of the Petitioner's needs and any safety or health risk if Petitioner were allowed to retain these items.

Did the Lower Courts err in failing to recognize the discrimination against Petitioner, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities and Rehabilitation Acts