whether states seizure op prisoners * stimulus payments violate the federal exemption
STATUTES WITHIN THE CARES ACT AND THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNTIED STATES
CONSTITUTION

WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED III DENYING THE PETITIONER'S RULE 15(d) SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM
REGARDING THE SEIZURE OF HIS STIMULUS PAYMENT lDOC. 44 \

WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED IN DENYING THE PETITIONER'S RULE JS>ldJ SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM
REGARDING THE UNLAWFUL ASSIGNMENT OF D1S1JT |Doc. 44 \

WHETHER THE COURTS SHOULD HAVE ASSIGNED THE PETITIONER COUNSEL |Doc. 46 |

WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED IN DENYING THE PETITIONER 'S REQUEST FOR A EMERGENCY
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION |0OC.'52|

WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED IN DENYING THE PETITIONER 'S REQUEST FOR A 'EXPERT ' TO
PERFORM AN AUDIT AND REPORT FOR THE COURT AND PARTIES |DOC. 56}

WHETHER THE APPELLATE COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE PETITIONER 'S 'COLLATERAL '
APPEAL UNDER 2fl tlSC 9 129!

Whether states' seizure of prisoners' stimulus payments violate the federal exemption statutes within the CARES Act and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution