No. 21-5689
Harold V. Hoskins v. Kevin Kauffman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL AS MEANT BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT
AND
DID THE ACTIONS OF "ALL" COUNSEL INVOLVED DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS PER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS ?
AS A RESULT OF THE INEFFECTIVENESS OF "ALL" COUNSEL WAS THE PETITIONER DEPRIVED OF A FAIR TRIAL ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to be represented by counsel?
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Harold Hoskins
Harold Hoskins — Petitioner