(1) Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals for the State of Hawaii improperly applied mootness to dismiss the case by bypassing the federal question of whether it applied an impermissible offensive use of the collateral order doctrine to the foreclosure decree to preclude a collateral attack of jurisdiction from the order confirming sale?

(2) Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals for the State of Hawaii improperly applied mootness to dismiss the case by bypassing the federal question of whether Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment section rights of one due process and equal protection were violated by the cumulative effect of the Hawau foreclosure proceeding, including the impermissible offensive application of the collateral order doctrine rule to the foreclosure decree to preclude a collateral attack of jurisdiction from the order confirming sale?

Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals improperly applied mootness and the collateral order doctrine