No. 21-5653

In Re Matthew Phillips

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment probable-cause reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive the "effective assistance of counsel," as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States of America's Constitution!

II. Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive the "right. ..to be secure in [his] person[ ]...against unreasonable searches and seizures" as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States of America's Constitution.

III. Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive "bail" and "cruel and unusual punishments [were] inflicted," as guaranteed, in the Eighth Amendment to the United States of America's Constitution.

IV. Matthew Sherman Phillips received deprivation "of life, liberty, [and] property, without due process of law," contrary to the Citizenship and Equal Protection Clauses, in essence, tne State of Alabama abridged "the privileges or immunities of [Matthew Sherman Phillips] citizen[ship] of the United States" as guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States of America's Constitution.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-08-23
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Matthew Phillips
Matthew Phillips — Petitioner