DueProcess
Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive the "effective assistance of counsel," as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States of America's Constitution!
II. Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive the "right. ..to be secure in [his] person[ ]...against unreasonable searches and seizures" as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States of America's Constitution.
III. Matthew Sherman Phillips did not receive "bail" and "cruel and unusual punishments [were] inflicted," as guaranteed, in the Eighth Amendment to the United States of America's Constitution.
IV. Matthew Sherman Phillips received deprivation "of life, liberty, [and] property, without due process of law," contrary to the Citizenship and Equal Protection Clauses, in essence, tne State of Alabama abridged "the privileges or immunities of [Matthew Sherman Phillips] citizen[ship] of the United States" as guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States of America's Constitution.
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures