1. In Limited Government terms, when are effective limitations so tangible as to
define Fraud on the Court and Criminal Contempt in terms of judicial
misrepresentation of Independent Citizens ' Civil petitions against
Unconstitutional State laws?

2. Abuse of Procedures: Are written opinions, final judgments, by any Federal
Judge fraudulent in declaration just in terms of read and review, when
apparently designed to affirm and protect, to covert, a deliberative
misrepresentation, to successively maintain fraudulent disposition against
any kind of party? (Is it not a fraudulent declaration, when based upon a
previous and similar fraud?)

3. IFP Screening, Whether effective case screening was irrequisite: should not
District Courts and Courts of Appeals take decent and reasonable care to
maintain the validity, realism, and legality of any original filing by any party
proceeding in forma pauperis, and neither have misrepresented nor abridged
essential, recognizable, and consensual substance of the filing?

Whether effective limitations on government power can define fraud on the court and criminal contempt in judicial misrepresentation of citizens' civil petitions